AIDS Meds: Founded & Operated by People with HIVPOZ logo
Back to home » Treatment News » Top Stories

emailrssprint

Lexiva vs. Kaletra

May 16, 2006

By Tim Horn

GlaxoSmithKline and Vertex Pharmaceuticals have issued a press release reporting the results of a study comparing Lexiva® (also known as Telzir®) combined with Norvir®, to Kaletra®, both in combination with Epzicom®. The results, which have not yet been presented at a medical conference or published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, suggest that Lexiva is comparable to Kaletra in HIV-positive people beginning anti-HIV treatment for the first time.

The results are from the KLEAN study, a randomized, open-label study of the safety and efficacy of Lexiva (fosamprenavir; 700mg twice daily), in combination with Norvir (ritonavir; 100mg twice daily), versus Kaletra (400mg lopinavir plus 100mg ritonavir twice daily). Patients also received once-daily Epzicom (a tablet containing 600mg abacavir and 300mg lamivudine). The study enrolled 887 HIV-positive patients beginning treatment for the first time and followed them on therapy for 48 weeks.

The press release indicates that 73% of patients in the Lexiva/Norvir group maintained viral loads below 400 copies/mL after 48 weeks, compared with 71% of patients in the Kaletra group. The press release did not report the percentage of patients in either group who had viral loads below 50 copies/mL after 48 weeks – the best viral load result that can be achieved using anti-HIV treatment. Neither was there a mention of T-cell comparisons between the two groups.

Both regimens were generally well-tolerated. A total of 6% of patients withdrew due to adverse events. While the press release did not describe the adverse events, it did say that they were consistent with those already known to occur with Lexiva/Norvir and Kaletra.

According to GlaxoSmithKline and Vertex, Lexiva/Norvir was compared to Kaletra due to Kaletra's position as the preferred HIV protease inhibitor for HIV-positive patients beginning treatment for the first time in HIV treatment guidelines developed by the United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and the International AIDS Society (IAS).

The validity of these preliminary results have not yet been publicly reviewed by HIV experts not associated with the study. GlaxoSmithKline will present these and other data at a medical conference in 2006.

Sources:

GlaxoSmithKline and Vertex Pharmaceuticals

emailrssprint



[Go to top]



Most Popular Stories

Spring Awakening: HIV, Allergies and Sinusitis

Evolutionary Accident Makes HIV Deadly

Hetero Men Also at Risk for Anal HPV

HIV Immunotherapy Shows Promise

Bad Teeth Also Bad for Young Men’s Hearts

Transplanting Hope: Stem Cell Experiment Raises Eyebrows at CROI


Most Popular Lessons

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Shingles

The HIV Life Cycle

Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)

What's That Mean?
(just double-click it!)

If you don't understand one of the words in this article, just double-click it. A window will open with a definition from CancerWEB's On-line Medical Dictionary. If the double-click feature doesn't work in your browser, you can enter the word below:


Archive

May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
February 2006


© 2008 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. terms of use and your privacy