AIDS Meds: Founded & Operated by People with HIVPOZ logo
Back to home » Treatment News » Top Stories

emailrssprint

Isentress Offers Long-Term Benefits for Drug-Resistant Patients

September 18, 2007

By Tim Horn

New follow-up data from a Phase II clinical trial evaluating Merck's integrase inhibitor Isentress (raltegravir) suggests that the drug may offer long-term benefits to HIV-positive people with extensive treatment experience and drug resistance. The study also suggests that drug combinations containing Isentress are relatively well-tolerated.

The results were reported today at the 47th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) in Chicago. Forty-eight weeks of follow-up data were reported by Jose Gatell, MD, PhD, of the Evandro Chagas Clinical Research Institute in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.

The clinical trial compared Isentress plus an optimized background regimen (OBR) to placebo plus OBR, looking at changes in viral load and CD4 cell counts, along with safety and tolerability. Enrolled study volunteers received one of three doses of Istentress (200mg, 400mg, or 600mg) or placebo—both taken twice daily—plus OBR consisting of available HIV drugs that were selected using drug-resistance testing.

When the 400mg twice-daily Isentress dose was selected for use in the Phase III BENCHMRK studies, the Phase II study was amended so that everyone was offered open-label Isentress after they had been followed in their original double-blind treatment group for at least 24 weeks.

After 178 patients completed the double-blind part of the study, 100 volunteers—including six patients originally assigned to the placebo group—made the switch to open-label Isentress plus OBR.

On average, enrolled patients had been on some form of HIV therapy for nine years—averaging four previous drug regimens—and had viral loads between 40,000 and 70,000 upon entering the trial. Their CD4 cell counts, prior to beginning either Isentress or placebo, ranged from 220 to 274.

According to Dr. Gatell, reductions in viral load observed at week 24 were sustained over 48 weeks. After almost a year of therapy, 64 to 71 percent of those taking Isentress plus OBR had viral loads below 400; 46 to 64 percent had viral loads below 50. What’s more, among patients followed for up to 72 weeks, viral loads remained below 400 in approximately 70 percent.

CD4 counts increased, on average, by 64 to 110 cells among patients treated with Isentress plus OBR over 48 weeks.

Of the 38 patients who saw their viral loads rebound while on treatment, 35 had evidence of drug resistance to Isentress, documented using genotypic testing.

The risk of Isentress failing was highest among patients who were highly resistant to all of the drugs used in their OBRs, underscoring the importance of constructing treatment regimens that contain at least two effective antiretrovirals.  Dr. Gatell reported that, among the 38 patients no longer responding the their regimen, 68 percent used an OBR that didn't contain any active agents.

Istentress, at all doses studied, plus OBR was reported to be generally well-tolerated and comparable to placebo plus OBR. The most common side effects in the double-blind component of the study were diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, headache and itching. Five patients discontinued treatment due these (or other) adverse effects.

Earlier this month, an FDA advisory committee recommended that Isentress be approved for the treatment of drug-resistant HIV. An official decision from the agency is expected by mid-October.

Source:

Grinsztejn B, Nguyen B, Katlama C, et al. 48 week efficacy and safety of MK-0518, a novel HIV-1 integrase inhibitor, in patients with triple-class resistant virus [Abstract H-713]. 47th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, 2007.

NEW! Scroll down to comment on this story.

emailrssprint


Name:

(2-50 characters)

Email:

(will not show)

City:

(optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The AIDSmeds team review all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment.)

| Posting Rules

Previous Comments:

       


[Go to top]



Most Popular Stories

Spring Awakening: HIV, Allergies and Sinusitis

Evolutionary Accident Makes HIV Deadly

Hetero Men Also at Risk for Anal HPV

HIV Immunotherapy Shows Promise

Bad Teeth Also Bad for Young Men’s Hearts

Transplanting Hope: Stem Cell Experiment Raises Eyebrows at CROI


Most Popular Lessons

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Shingles

The HIV Life Cycle

Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)

What's That Mean?
(just double-click it!)

If you don't understand one of the words in this article, just double-click it. A window will open with a definition from CancerWEB's On-line Medical Dictionary. If the double-click feature doesn't work in your browser, you can enter the word below:


Treatment News Archive

May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
February 2006


© 2008 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. terms of use and your privacy